The reason why we decided to do a pitch to promote our
opening titles was to get constructive feedback. The way we would do that is by
asking our peers to fill out a little slip which had questions connected to our
pitch. The questions we asked were:
•Do you like the name? why?
•Would you watch the film? why?
•What do you like about the story?
•Are the titles clear?
•What would you improve?
•Rate the film out of 5*s (5* being the best)?
We thought these questions would give us a good insight on
how to change the opening titles to make it better for the audience, and
covered all the topic we needed to. We got 10 feedback sheets back and we have
analysed them:
The first question which was asked was. Do you like the
name?
We asked this because we didn't actually have a name at this
stage because we decided to do this at the end so it related to the plot and
the genre which we weren’t sure on at this time. So what we decided to do was
ask our peers to think of a name after our pitch which they did a few example
of what we got were names such as. Life struck, The walking Conor, Hunted, The
life of PJ. We took these names into discussion.
The second question we asked our peers to talk about was.
Would you watch the film?
We decided to ask this to see if the plot sounded
interesting or to see if we sold the opening title well. 7 out of the 10 said
that they would watch it. We then asked they why in which 5 out of the 7 said
because it looked interesting. the other 2 that said yes was because it was a
good style. But we will also take the constructive criticism which was that it
sounded boring. We are looking closely into why someone found it boring and try
and sort the problem out, but we understand the thriller genre isn't for
everyone.
The third question which we asked our peers was to talk
about was. What do you like about the story?
We thought this was a good question to ask because if gave
use an idea on how affective the story line was and improvements we could make on
the story line. The feedback we got for this question was very positive it
seemed that most of our peers thought it was an interesting storyline and well
thought out.
The fourth question we decided to ask was. Were the titles
clear?
This was an important question to ask but at this stage of
when we did the pitch, we didn't have a title we only had our production
company name. So our peers couldn't answer this question, but later on when we
get our titles sorted we will get the to review it and hopefully get some
feedback on improvements.
The Fifth question we asked was. What would you improve?
We decided to pick this question because it is ok getting
the positive feedback but it is important we get feedback in which will make us
improve and widen the target audience. From the feedback from the peers we have
decided to improve the storyline because two people said that it sounded
boring. We have decided to increase the storyline and make it bigger because it
was very short and wasn't it enough detail.
The sixth question that we asked was. Rate the film out of
5*s (5* being the best)?
We asked this question so we knew where we stood and how
well we sold our opening titles. The feedback for this question was very good
as 8/10 and 2 put 4. I believe this is good but there is still more for
improvement.